AND THE WINNERS ARE…
An open, interdisciplinary challenge to create a public, interactive, educational and imaginative element that will contribute significantly to the social, cultural, and physical environment of the North Campus.
The competition organizers anticipate your team’s proposal will be situated somewhere in the blue zone, indicated on the North Campus Map on the competition’s homepage (please see downloadable file). Obviously there should a logical relationship between what is proposed and where it is placed, but the exact location is up to the team.
A total of $20,000 in prizes will be awarded. First Place will be 10,000, Second 5,000, and an additional 5,000 will be distributed among others winners for special prizes.
No. The competition is an optional, extracurricular activity above and beyond the course load of students and/or faculty members.
Yes, an individual may participate on more than one team. However, multiple members (i.e., two or more) from one team cannot participate together on another team.
Yes, you can propose a temporary structure and/or one that has limited use.
In reviewing submissions, the jury will use their best professional judgment to gauge which projects fall within a reasonable range. Teams are not required to have a professional cost estimate done, but must have a reasonable sense of their project would cost to realize.
No.
No, you would still have to team with someone from outside the Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning. The brief states “Teams submitting proposals for consideration must: … have at least 2 student members who are pursuing degrees in different North Campus units. Unites are defined as the College of Engineering; the School of Music, Theater and Dance; the Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning; the School of Art and Design; and the School of Information. Teams must represent at least two disciplines, although more are encouraged.”
We are looking into creating an online bulletin board so that people who want to form teams can find people outside their discipline.
At the end of the competition, the jury will identify a first and second prizewinner and as many honorable mentions they as they decide to award. The first prizewinner will be awarded $10,000. The second prizewinner will be awarded $5,000. The honorable mentions will receive awards totaling up to $5,000.
The University plans to move forward with the winning project. The Winning Team will remain involved in the development of the project in a capacity commensurate with their level of expertise and experience.
It is possible that more than one project or a hybrid borne out of a number of different submitted proposals might be developed, with the consent and participation of the respective teams. The exact logistics and protocols would be worked out once the sponsors have a clearer sense of the strength of the entries and the number of ideas they would like to advance. Teams may elect to not participate in the development of the realized project, but will continue to be credited for the contributions they have made up to that point. The terms for compensation for any work after the competition will be negotiated in accordance with the scope of the work.
Please revisit the Eligibility requirements. We have clarified the language to address these sorts of questions.
We are sorry you were not able to attend and no, it doesn’t put you at a disadvantage. During the session we provided an overview of the competition — essentially reiterating the information that appears on this website. We also fielded a number of questions, which we have incorporated into this list. If you take a moment to review the materials online you should be up to date.
The total construction budget is $500,000. The full build-out of the project — exterior and interior — should be within the stated dollar amount.
This is really two separate questions. The first is about design alternatives. The competition prohibits teams from submitting more than one entry. If your ‘design alternative’ is a completely different design or a radical departure from the base proposal, the jury will likely consider it to be two separate designs. However, if your ‘design alternative’ is a minor variation on your basic concept or part of a larger design idea that proposes a set of alternatives derived from a kit of recombinant elements, then it would be allowed. In short, alternatives are okay if they tie into some larger idea about your project that remains constant across each of the options.
The second question has to do with alternate locations. The competition does not require your concept to be site specific, and so proposing alternate locations for your design is perfectly acceptable.
The available materials are posted on the competition website. Teams are encouraged to conduct their own research and develop additional drawings if they deem it necessary.
The audio portion of your submission (should you wish to produce one) should be part of your digital video presentation, like a soundtrack.
Yes, they may participate as members on a team. Remember that to qualify as a team, your group must include at least two students from different North Campus units. Please review earlier posts to this page and the competition brief for further clarification on this issue.
© 2007 Regents | U-M Gateway | Web Design by MM&D